On 04/23, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:02:08PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > Gautham, isn't it possible to make a more simpler patch ? Just add
> > PF_NOFREEZE
> > check to frozen_process,
> >
> > static inline void frozen_process(struct task_struct *p)
> >
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:02:08PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday, 19 April 2007 14:02, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > > This patch fixes the race pointed out by Oleg Nesterov.
> > >
> > > * Freezer marks a thread as freezeable.
> > > * The thre
On 04/19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 19 April 2007 14:02, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > This patch fixes the race pointed out by Oleg Nesterov.
> >
> > * Freezer marks a thread as freezeable.
> > * The thread now marks itself PF_NOFREEZE causing it to
> > freeze on calling try_to_
Hi,
On Thursday, 19 April 2007 14:02, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> This patch fixes the race pointed out by Oleg Nesterov.
>
> * Freezer marks a thread as freezeable.
> * The thread now marks itself PF_NOFREEZE causing it to
> freeze on calling try_to_freeze(). Thus the task is frozen, even thoug
This patch fixes the race pointed out by Oleg Nesterov.
* Freezer marks a thread as freezeable.
* The thread now marks itself PF_NOFREEZE causing it to
freeze on calling try_to_freeze(). Thus the task is frozen, even though
it doesn't want to.
* Subsequent thaw_processes() will also fail to t
5 matches
Mail list logo