On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:25:11AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> > That'd work, but I assume there is some reason why we've got this system
> > of explicitly adding each file. It's not like cpp can test for the
> > presence of include files. If we
On Tuesday 16 October 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:18:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> I came up with stuff for it, though it needed prettyfying.
>
> > This seems to do the trick:
>
> > (It's the diff result of ln -s asm-generic include/asm)
Unfortunately,
On Tuesday 16 October 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:18:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I came up with stuff for it, though it needed prettyfying.
This seems to do the trick:
(It's the diff result of ln -s asm-generic include/asm)
Unfortunately, this is not
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 09:25:11AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 October 2012, Mark Brown wrote:
That'd work, but I assume there is some reason why we've got this system
of explicitly adding each file. It's not like cpp can test for the
presence of include files. If we can't
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:18:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Arnd Bergmann :
> > On Monday 15 October 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> > 2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt :
> >> > > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100,
2012/10/15 Arnd Bergmann :
> On Monday 15 October 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> > 2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt :
>> > > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> > > BTW, is there any rational reason that the include
On Monday 15 October 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > 2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt :
> > > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > BTW, is there any rational reason that the include path lookup doesn't
> > > just
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt :
> > On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >> On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> >> >
2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt :
> On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
>> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
>> > new file mode 100644
>> > index 000..f1bffa2
>> > ---
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> > b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000..f1bffa2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..f1bffa2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +#include
> diff --git
On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..f1bffa2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+#include
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
new file mode 100644
index 000..f1bffa2
--- /dev/null
+++
2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
new file mode 100644
index
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
On Monday 15 October 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
BTW, is there any rational reason that the include path lookup doesn't
2012/10/15 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de:
On Monday 15 October 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
BTW, is there any rational
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:18:05AM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/10/15 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de:
On Monday 15 October 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 22:23 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/10/15 Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org:
On Mon, 2012-10-15
This optimization doesn't matter much. But this prepares the
arch headers that we need to add a new API in order to detect
when the arch hooks on the tick to implement the irq work.
This is necessary later to make printk working in nohz CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Peter
This optimization doesn't matter much. But this prepares the
arch headers that we need to add a new API in order to detect
when the arch hooks on the tick to implement the irq work.
This is necessary later to make printk working in nohz CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
20 matches
Mail list logo
