The tegra114 driver has a weird/separate `tegra_spi_transfer_delay()` function that does 2 delays: one mdelay() and one udelay().
This was introduced via commit f4fade12d506e14867a2b0a5e2f7aaf227297d8b ("spi/tegra114: Correct support for cs_change"). There doesn't seem to be a mention in that commit message to suggest a specific need/use-case for having the 2 delay calls. For the most part, udelay() should be sufficient. This change replaces it with the new `spi_transfer_delay()`, which should do the same thing. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com> --- drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c | 17 +++-------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c index 39374c2edcf3..5ac2ceb234fc 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-tegra114.c @@ -984,17 +984,6 @@ static int tegra_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) return 0; } -static void tegra_spi_transfer_delay(int delay) -{ - if (!delay) - return; - - if (delay >= 1000) - mdelay(delay / 1000); - - udelay(delay % 1000); -} - static void tegra_spi_transfer_end(struct spi_device *spi) { struct tegra_spi_data *tspi = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); @@ -1098,7 +1087,7 @@ static int tegra_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master, complete_xfer: if (ret < 0 || skip) { tegra_spi_transfer_end(spi); - tegra_spi_transfer_delay(xfer->delay_usecs); + spi_transfer_delay(xfer); goto exit; } else if (list_is_last(&xfer->transfer_list, &msg->transfers)) { @@ -1106,11 +1095,11 @@ static int tegra_spi_transfer_one_message(struct spi_master *master, tspi->cs_control = spi; else { tegra_spi_transfer_end(spi); - tegra_spi_transfer_delay(xfer->delay_usecs); + spi_transfer_delay(xfer); } } else if (xfer->cs_change) { tegra_spi_transfer_end(spi); - tegra_spi_transfer_delay(xfer->delay_usecs); + spi_transfer_delay(xfer); } } -- 2.20.1