On 8/2/19 11:58 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
On 25-07-19, 18:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
only when enabled.
We discussed this with Ulf sometime back and it was a consensus the core
should handle it, but that may take a while.
So
On 25-07-19, 18:40, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
> only when enabled.
We discussed this with Ulf sometime back and it was a consensus the core
should handle it, but that may take a while.
So that led me to explore what others do
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 06:58:09PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:57:46AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > On 7/30/19 6:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:07:39PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > > On 7/26/19 2:08 PM, Andy
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 07:57:46AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/30/19 6:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:07:39PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > On 7/26/19 2:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500,
On 7/30/19 6:21 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:07:39PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 7/26/19 2:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES)
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 05:07:39PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/26/19 2:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > - if (ret < 0)
> > > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES)
> >
> > ...and here, the
On 7/26/19 2:08 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
This thread became unreadable with interleaved top-posting, allow me restate
the options and ask PM folks what they think
On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
Not all
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 08:25:35PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
> > > only when enabled.
> >
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> This thread became unreadable with interleaved top-posting, allow me restate
> the options and ask PM folks what they think
>
> On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 01:08:57PM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> This thread became unreadable with interleaved top-posting, allow me restate
> the options and ask PM folks what they think
>
> On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now,
This thread became unreadable with interleaved top-posting, allow me
restate the options and ask PM folks what they think
On 7/25/19 6:40 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
only when enabled.
Suggested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 08:33:35AM +, Jan Kotas wrote:
>
>
> > On 26 Jul 2019, at 10:22, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > wrote:
> >
> > EXTERNAL MAIL
> >
> >
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:47:04AM +, Jan Kotas wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I while back I proposed a patch
> On 26 Jul 2019, at 10:22, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
>
> EXTERNAL MAIL
>
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:47:04AM +, Jan Kotas wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I while back I proposed a patch for this, but it went nowhere.
>>
>>
Hi Jan,
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 07:47:04AM +, Jan Kotas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I while back I proposed a patch for this, but it went nowhere.
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10887405/
> Maybe something similar can be implemented?
Yes, I was thinking about checkint -EACCESS too, but
Hello,
I while back I proposed a patch for this, but it went nowhere.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10887405/
Maybe something similar can be implemented?
Jan
> On 26 Jul 2019, at 09:39, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> wrote:
>
> EXTERNAL MAIL
>
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> I might be wrong but this
Hi Pierre,
I might be wrong but this doesn't seem right to me. (Supposedly) all RT-PM
functions check for "enabled" internally. The only thing that can happen is
that if RT-PM isn't enabled some of those functions will return an error.
So, in those cases where the return value of RT-PM functions
Not all platforms support runtime_pm for now, let's use runtime_pm
only when enabled.
Suggested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart
---
drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 25 -
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git
17 matches
Mail list logo
