Hi Jaehoon,
On 2016/5/27 8:53, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On 05/26/2016 12:08 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
Hi Jaehoon,
On 2016/5/27 8:53, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
Hi Shawn,
On 05/26/2016 12:08 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
Hi Shawn,
On 05/26/2016 12:08 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
> mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
> check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
> dw_mci_init_slot for noremovable devices, but there is
Hi Shawn,
On 05/26/2016 12:08 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
> The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
> mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
> check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
> dw_mci_init_slot for noremovable devices, but there is
The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
dw_mci_init_slot for noremovable devices, but there is a timing
gap before it really calls dw_mci_get_cd as
The main reason to add this check is to avoid unnecessary
mmc_request if the card is removed. Although we have already
check this in dw_mci_handle_cd for runtime usage of sd card and
dw_mci_init_slot for noremovable devices, but there is a timing
gap before it really calls dw_mci_get_cd as
6 matches
Mail list logo
