On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:45:46AM +0100, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi Mika,
> >
> > While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
> > device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
> >
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:45:46AM +0100, Darren Hart wrote:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Mika,
While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
(a false)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
> device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
> (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below.
Hi Mark,
The
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Mika,
>
> While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
> device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
> (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below.
>
> On Sun, Aug 17,
Hi Mika,
While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
(a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 07:04:12AM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> This document describes
Hi Mika,
While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
(a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 07:04:12AM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote:
This document describes
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Mika,
While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
(a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Mika,
While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing
device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming
(a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below.
Hi Mark,
The
This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device
specific properties.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart
---
Documentation/acpi/properties.txt | 359 ++
1 file changed, 359 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device
specific properties.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com
---
Documentation/acpi/properties.txt | 359 ++
1 file
10 matches
Mail list logo