Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:45:46AM +0100, Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Hi Mika, > > > > While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing > > device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-19 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 06:45:46AM +0100, Darren Hart wrote: On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi Mika, While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming (a false)

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-18 Thread Darren Hart
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Mika, > > While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing > device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming > (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below. Hi Mark, The

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-18 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Mika, > > While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing > device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming > (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below. > > On Sun, Aug 17,

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-18 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Mika, While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 07:04:12AM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote: > This document describes

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-18 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Mika, While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 07:04:12AM +0100, Mika Westerberg wrote: This document describes

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-18 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi Mika, While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below. On Sun, Aug 17, 2014

Re: [RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-18 Thread Darren Hart
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: Hi Mika, While I am very much in favour of having a structured way of describing device specific data in ACPI I am very concerned by the idea of assuming (a false) equivalence with DT. More on that below. Hi Mark, The

[RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-17 Thread Mika Westerberg
This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device specific properties. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg Signed-off-by: Darren Hart --- Documentation/acpi/properties.txt | 359 ++ 1 file changed, 359 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[RFC PATCH 2/9] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties

2014-08-17 Thread Mika Westerberg
This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device specific properties. Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg mika.westerb...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com --- Documentation/acpi/properties.txt | 359 ++ 1 file