Hi,
On 06/06/2019 21:03, Wolfram Sang wrote:
- dev = bus_find_device(_bus_type, NULL, adev,
- i2c_acpi_find_match_device);
+ dev = bus_find_device(_bus_type, NULL, adev, device_match_acpi_dev);
In general, this looks like a nice cleanup which I am in
> - dev = bus_find_device(_bus_type, NULL, adev,
> - i2c_acpi_find_match_device);
> + dev = bus_find_device(_bus_type, NULL, adev, device_match_acpi_dev);
In general, this looks like a nice cleanup which I am in favour of.
However, I didn't understand why ACPI
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:49:48PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Switch to the generic helper to match device by acpi_dev.
It would be nice if you had Cc'd actual implementation of
device_match_acpi_dev() as well but if it looks like
i2c_acpi_find_match_device() then this is fine by me,
Switch to the generic helper to match device by acpi_dev.
Cc: Mika Westerberg
Cc: Wolfram Sang
cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 8 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
4 matches
Mail list logo
