Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: document "start-offset" binding

2017-07-06 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 02:39:11PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Document "start-offset" binding that will be used by at24 > EEPROM driver. Why do we need this property? Seems like this should be handled by defining regions of the EEPROM that you care about (or perhaps are reserved and don't

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: document "start-offset" binding

2017-07-06 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 02:39:11PM +0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Document "start-offset" binding that will be used by at24 > EEPROM driver. Why do we need this property? Seems like this should be handled by defining regions of the EEPROM that you care about (or perhaps are reserved and don't

[RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: document "start-offset" binding

2017-06-29 Thread Claudiu Beznea
Document "start-offset" binding that will be used by at24 EEPROM driver. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt

[RFC PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: i2c: eeprom: document "start-offset" binding

2017-06-29 Thread Claudiu Beznea
Document "start-offset" binding that will be used by at24 EEPROM driver. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/eeprom.txt