On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:44:52AM +0200, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> This change achieves up to 10% of speed-up for cpudl_set() calls, as
> measured with a andomly generated workload of 1K,10K,100K random heap
> insertions and deletions (75% cpudl_set() calls with is_valid=1 and
> 25% with is_valid
Hi,
On 19/07/16 11:44, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> This change achieves up to 10% of speed-up for cpudl_set() calls, as
> measured with a andomly generated workload of 1K,10K,100K random heap
> insertions and deletions (75% cpudl_set() calls with is_valid=1 and
> 25% with is_valid=0), and randomly
This change achieves up to 10% of speed-up for cpudl_set() calls, as
measured with a andomly generated workload of 1K,10K,100K random heap
insertions and deletions (75% cpudl_set() calls with is_valid=1 and
25% with is_valid=0), and randomly generated cpu IDs, with up to 256
CPUs, as measured on an
---
kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c | 114 +++--
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
index 3c42702..60f933a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpudeadline.
4 matches
Mail list logo
