Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families

2020-12-02 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 11:13:02PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Didn't realize the core was internal only. F10h is not internal only - all I'm saying is that "K10" wasn't use inside AMD AFAIR. > Makes sense - I will follow your suggestion in the next version. Well, I don't think it is worth the

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families

2020-12-02 Thread Punit Agrawal
Hi Boris, Borislav Petkov writes: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:48:46PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: >> So far, the AMD processor identifier (family, models, stepping) are >> referred to by raw values making it easy to make mistakes. It is also >> harder to read and maintain. Additionally, these v

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families

2020-11-30 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:48:46PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: > So far, the AMD processor identifier (family, models, stepping) are > referred to by raw values making it easy to make mistakes. It is also > harder to read and maintain. Additionally, these values are also being > used in subsystems

[RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families

2020-11-25 Thread Punit Agrawal
So far, the AMD processor identifier (family, models, stepping) are referred to by raw values making it easy to make mistakes. It is also harder to read and maintain. Additionally, these values are also being used in subsystems outside the arch code where not everybody maybe be as familiar with the