On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:03:48AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:00 AM, David Gibson
> wrote:
> >> If the only property needed is the partition table offset, it can be
> >> encoded
> >> in the unit-address, and the "reg" property:
> >>
> >> pa
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 7:00 AM, David Gibson
wrote:
>> If the only property needed is the partition table offset, it can be encoded
>> in the unit-address, and the "reg" property:
>>
>> partitions {
>>
>> partition-table@ {
>> reg = <
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:22:46AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:51 AM, David Gibson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30P
On 14 December 2015 at 11:22, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:51 AM, David Gibson
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Micha
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 6:51 AM, David Gibson
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> > > On 5 December 2015 at 12:39, Jonas Gors
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:43:24PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > > On 5 December 2015 at 12:39, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Brian No
Hello,
On 10 December 2015 at 21:43, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> > On 5 December 2015 at 12:39, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Brian Norris
>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 12:36:28PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > On 5 December 2015 at 12:39, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Brian Norris
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >> +
> > >> +Examples:
> > >> +
> > >> +fl
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:19:19PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> The platform description (such as the type of partition formats used on
> a given flash) should be done independently of the flash driver in use.
> However, we can't reasonably have *all* partition parsers run on all
> flash (until the
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 10:33:30PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 5 December 2015 at 12:39, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Brian Norris
> > wrote:
>
> >> +
> >> +Examples:
> >> +
> >> +flash@0 {
> >> + partitions {
> >> + compatible = "google,fmap
On 5 December 2015 at 12:39, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Brian Norris
> wrote:
>> +
>> +Examples:
>> +
>> +flash@0 {
>> + partitions {
>> + compatible = "google,fmap";
>> + };
>> +};
>
> I wonder if this wouldn't be better served in a separate
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Brian Norris
wrote:
> The platform description (such as the type of partition formats used on
> a given flash) should be done independently of the flash driver in use.
> However, we can't reasonably have *all* partition parsers run on all
> flash (until they find a
The platform description (such as the type of partition formats used on
a given flash) should be done independently of the flash driver in use.
However, we can't reasonably have *all* partition parsers run on all
flash (until they find a match), so let's overload the 'partitions'
subnode to support
13 matches
Mail list logo
