On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 16:05 +0800, wenwei tao wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> I understand what you said.
>
> I will use the function 'is_vm_hugetlb_page()' to hide the bit
> combinations according to your comments in the next version of patch
> set.
>
> But for the situation like below, there isn't an
Hi Scott
I understand what you said.
I will use the function 'is_vm_hugetlb_page()' to hide the bit
combinations according to your comments in the next version of patch
set.
But for the situation like below, there isn't an obvious structure
'vma', using 'is_vm_hugetlb_page()' maybe costly or
Hi Scott
I understand what you said.
I will use the function 'is_vm_hugetlb_page()' to hide the bit
combinations according to your comments in the next version of patch
set.
But for the situation like below, there isn't an obvious structure
'vma', using 'is_vm_hugetlb_page()' maybe costly or
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 16:05 +0800, wenwei tao wrote:
Hi Scott
I understand what you said.
I will use the function 'is_vm_hugetlb_page()' to hide the bit
combinations according to your comments in the next version of patch
set.
But for the situation like below, there isn't an obvious
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:47 +0800, wenwei tao wrote:
> Hi Scott
>
> Thank you for your comments.
>
> Kernel already has that function: is_vm_hugetlb_page() , but the
> original code didn't use it,
> in order to keep the coding style of the original code, I didn't use it
> either.
>
> For the
On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 16:47 +0800, wenwei tao wrote:
Hi Scott
Thank you for your comments.
Kernel already has that function: is_vm_hugetlb_page() , but the
original code didn't use it,
in order to keep the coding style of the original code, I didn't use it
either.
For the sentence
Hi Scott
Thank you for your comments.
Kernel already has that function: is_vm_hugetlb_page() , but the
original code didn't use it,
in order to keep the coding style of the original code, I didn't use it either.
For the sentence like: "vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGETLB" , hiding it behind
Hi Scott
Thank you for your comments.
Kernel already has that function: is_vm_hugetlb_page() , but the
original code didn't use it,
in order to keep the coding style of the original code, I didn't use it either.
For the sentence like: vma-vm_flags VM_HUGETLB , hiding it behind
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 14:27 +0800, Wenwei Tao wrote:
> Hugetlb VMAs are not mergeable, that means a VMA couldn't have VM_HUGETLB
> and
> VM_MERGEABLE been set in the same time. So we use VM_HUGETLB to indicate new
> mergeable VMAs. Because of that a VMA which has VM_HUGETLB been set is a
>
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 14:27 +0800, Wenwei Tao wrote:
Hugetlb VMAs are not mergeable, that means a VMA couldn't have VM_HUGETLB
and
VM_MERGEABLE been set in the same time. So we use VM_HUGETLB to indicate new
mergeable VMAs. Because of that a VMA which has VM_HUGETLB been set is a
hugetlb
Hugetlb VMAs are not mergeable, that means a VMA couldn't have VM_HUGETLB and
VM_MERGEABLE been set in the same time. So we use VM_HUGETLB to indicate new
mergeable VMAs. Because of that a VMA which has VM_HUGETLB been set is a hugetlb
VMA only if it doesn't have VM_MERGEABLE been set in the same
Hugetlb VMAs are not mergeable, that means a VMA couldn't have VM_HUGETLB and
VM_MERGEABLE been set in the same time. So we use VM_HUGETLB to indicate new
mergeable VMAs. Because of that a VMA which has VM_HUGETLB been set is a hugetlb
VMA only if it doesn't have VM_MERGEABLE been set in the same
12 matches
Mail list logo
