2012/10/20 Joe Perches :
> On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 12:22 -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> lets implement the printk tick using irq work.
>
> Hi Frederic.
>
> Can you redo this change please against -next in a few days?
>
> Andrew Morton picked up this series,
>
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 12:22 -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> lets implement the printk tick using irq work.
Hi Frederic.
Can you redo this change please against -next in a few days?
Andrew Morton picked up this series,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/17/41
but it's not yet in -next.
klogd is woken up asynchronously from the tick in order
to do it safely.
However if printk is called when the tick is stopped, the reader
won't be woken up until the next interrupt, which might not fire
before a while. As a result, the user may miss some message.
To fix this, lets implement the
klogd is woken up asynchronously from the tick in order
to do it safely.
However if printk is called when the tick is stopped, the reader
won't be woken up until the next interrupt, which might not fire
before a while. As a result, the user may miss some message.
To fix this, lets implement the
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 12:22 -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
lets implement the printk tick using irq work.
Hi Frederic.
Can you redo this change please against -next in a few days?
Andrew Morton picked up this series,
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/17/41
but it's not yet in -next.
2012/10/20 Joe Perches j...@perches.com:
On Sat, 2012-10-20 at 12:22 -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
lets implement the printk tick using irq work.
Hi Frederic.
Can you redo this change please against -next in a few days?
Andrew Morton picked up this series,
6 matches
Mail list logo
