Ack. Will have that in v2.
Hao
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 7:37 PM Andrii Nakryiko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:28 PM Hao Luo wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > This should ideally look like a real global variable extern:
> > >
> > > extern const struct rq runqueues __ksym;
> > >
> > >
> > > But that's
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 1:28 PM Hao Luo wrote:
>
> >
> > This should ideally look like a real global variable extern:
> >
> > extern const struct rq runqueues __ksym;
> >
> >
> > But that's the case for non-per-cpu variables. You didn't seem to
> > address per-CPU variables in this patch set. How
>
> This should ideally look like a real global variable extern:
>
> extern const struct rq runqueues __ksym;
>
>
> But that's the case for non-per-cpu variables. You didn't seem to
> address per-CPU variables in this patch set. How did you intend to
> handle that? We should look at a possible BPF
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:46 PM Hao Luo wrote:
>
> Extend ksyms.c selftest to make sure BTF enables direct loads of ksyms.
>
> Note that test is done against the kernel btf extended with kernel VARs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Luo
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms.c | 2 ++
> too
Extend ksyms.c selftest to make sure BTF enables direct loads of ksyms.
Note that test is done against the kernel btf extended with kernel VARs.
Signed-off-by: Hao Luo
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ksyms.c | 2 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_ksyms.c | 14 ++
5 matches
Mail list logo
