Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:17:45PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 04:55:01PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:02:04PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:31:46PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:27

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 04:55:01PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:02:04PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:31:46PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:31:53AM -

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 02:02:04PM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:31:46PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM,

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 03:31:46PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > >> > I've got a bug report about an e1000e inte

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-01 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface is >> > set up on top of it: >> > >> > $ ip

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-01 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:31:53AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface is > > set up on top of it: > > > > $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99 > > $ ip

Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-01 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface is > set up on top of it: > > $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99 > $ ip link set ens1f0 up > $ ip link set ens1f0.99 up > $ ip addr add 192.168.99.9

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-06-01 Thread Ruinskiy, Dima
rnel.org; intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org >Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces >functional after rxvlan off > >> From: Intel-wired-lan >> [mailto:intel-wired-lan-boun...@lists.osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Jeff >> Kirsher >> Sent: Wedne

RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-05-26 Thread Brown, Aaron F
; Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces > functional after rxvlan off > > On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 15:03 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface > > is > > set up

Re: [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-05-18 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 15:03 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: > I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface > is > set up on top of it: > > $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99 > $ ip link set ens1f0 up > $ ip link set ens1f0.99 up > $ ip addr add 192.168.9

[RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after rxvlan off

2016-05-17 Thread Jarod Wilson
I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface is set up on top of it: $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99 $ ip link set ens1f0 up $ ip link set ens1f0.99 up $ ip addr add 192.168.99.92 dev ens1f0.99 At this point, I can ping another host on vlan 99,