Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-12 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:39:10PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > >On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:03:40PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:18:59PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > >> > Jarod Wilson wrote: > >> > > >> > >This comes from an end-user

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-12 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:03:40PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:18:59PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on > > >hosts with bonded interfaces connected to some interest

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-12 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Jarod Wilson wrote: >On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:03:40PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:18:59PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >> > Jarod Wilson wrote: >> > >> > >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on >> > >hosts with bonded interfaces

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-08 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 02:12:56PM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:58:13AM CET, ja...@redhat.com wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:11:45AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >> Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:30:33PM CET, ja...@redhat.com wrote: > >> >This comes from an end-user request,

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-08 Thread Jiri Pirko
Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:58:13AM CET, ja...@redhat.com wrote: >On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:11:45AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:30:33PM CET, ja...@redhat.com wrote: >> >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on >> >hosts with bonded interfaces

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-07 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 04:18:59PM -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on > >hosts with bonded interfaces connected to some interest switch topologies, > >where 802.3ad isn't an option. They're currently

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2021-01-07 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 11:11:45AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:30:33PM CET, ja...@redhat.com wrote: > >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on > >hosts with bonded interfaces connected to some interest switch topologies, > >where 802.3ad

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2020-12-28 Thread Jiri Pirko
Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 08:30:33PM CET, ja...@redhat.com wrote: >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on >hosts with bonded interfaces connected to some interest switch topologies, >where 802.3ad isn't an option. They're currently running a proprietary >solution

Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2020-12-18 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Jarod Wilson wrote: >This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on >hosts with bonded interfaces connected to some interest switch topologies, >where 802.3ad isn't an option. They're currently running a proprietary >solution that effectively achieves load-balancing

[RFC PATCH net-next] bonding: add a vlan+srcmac tx hashing option

2020-12-18 Thread Jarod Wilson
This comes from an end-user request, where they're running multiple VMs on hosts with bonded interfaces connected to some interest switch topologies, where 802.3ad isn't an option. They're currently running a proprietary solution that effectively achieves load-balancing of VMs and bandwidth