Libo Chen writes:
> yes
> On 2014/1/6 16:42, Gao feng wrote:
>> On 01/06/2014 03:54 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
>>> On 2014/1/3 13:20, Cong Wang wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Libo Chen
wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Now, lxc created with veth can not be under control by
> cls
yes
On 2014/1/6 16:42, Gao feng wrote:
> On 01/06/2014 03:54 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
>> On 2014/1/3 13:20, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Libo Chen
>>> wrote:
Hi guys,
Now, lxc created with veth can not be under control by
cls_cgroup.
the former
On 01/06/2014 03:54 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
> On 2014/1/3 13:20, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Libo Chen
>> wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> Now, lxc created with veth can not be under control by
>>> cls_cgroup.
>>>
>>> the former discussion:
>>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/li
On 2014/1/3 13:20, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Now, lxc created with veth can not be under control by
>> cls_cgroup.
>>
>> the former discussion:
>> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1312.1/00214.html
>>
>> In short, because cl
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Libo Chen wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Now, lxc created with veth can not be under control by
> cls_cgroup.
>
> the former discussion:
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1312.1/00214.html
>
> In short, because cls_cgroup relys classid attached to sock
> filte
Hi guys,
Now, lxc created with veth can not be under control by
cls_cgroup.
the former discussion:
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1312.1/00214.html
In short, because cls_cgroup relys classid attached to sock
filter skb, but sock will be cleared inside dev_forward_skb()
in veth_xm
6 matches
Mail list logo