Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] regulator: bd718x7: Support SNVS low power state

2019-02-13 Thread Matti Vaittinen
Hello peeps, And my apologies! I was in a hurry yesterday. I had to pick up kid kid from kindegarden and I wanted to send the RFC before that - bad mistake. Should've learnd by now. Today I decided to continue work and use combination of regulator-always-on and regulator-boot-on instead of rohm,r

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] regulator: bd718x7: Support SNVS low power state

2019-02-12 Thread Matti Vaittinen
Hello Mark, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:08:31PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:19:38PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > > read ROHM BD71837 / BD71847 specific device tree bindings for > > controlling the PMIC shutdown/reset states and voltages for > > different HW states. The

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] regulator: bd718x7: Support SNVS low power state

2019-02-12 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 04:19:38PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > read ROHM BD71837 / BD71847 specific device tree bindings for > controlling the PMIC shutdown/reset states and voltages for > different HW states. The PMIC was designed to be used with NXP > i.MX8 SoC and it supports SNVS low power

[RFC PATCH v1 3/3] regulator: bd718x7: Support SNVS low power state

2019-02-12 Thread Matti Vaittinen
read ROHM BD71837 / BD71847 specific device tree bindings for controlling the PMIC shutdown/reset states and voltages for different HW states. The PMIC was designed to be used with NXP i.MX8 SoC and it supports SNVS low power state which seems to be typical for NXP i.MX SoCs. However, when SNVS is