2017-07-26 13:03 GMT+02:00 Patrice CHOTARD :
> Hi Alex
>
> On 07/21/2017 02:34 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
>> and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
>> Since
2017-07-26 13:03 GMT+02:00 Patrice CHOTARD :
> Hi Alex
>
> On 07/21/2017 02:34 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
>> Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
>> and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
>> Since this approach was
Hi Alex
On 07/21/2017 02:34 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
> and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
> Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
> increased
Hi Alex
On 07/21/2017 02:34 PM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
> and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
> Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
> increased
Looks good,
On 07/21/2017 05:34 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
> and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
> Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
> increased
Looks good,
On 07/21/2017 05:34 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
> Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
> and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
> Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
> increased
Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new
file
Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new
file
Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new
file
Initially each pin was declared in "include/dt-bindings/stm32f429-pinfunc.h"
and each definition contained SOC names (ex: STM32F429_PA9_FUNC_USART1_TX).
Since this approach was approved, the number of supported MCU has
increased (STM32F429/STM32F469/STM32f746/STM32H743). To avoid to add a new
file
10 matches
Mail list logo