Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used

2017-05-30 Thread Vinod Koul
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:06:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Douglas Anderson > wrote: > > In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function > > sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it > > was never used. ...but

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used

2017-05-30 Thread Doug Anderson
Hi, On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Douglas Anderson > wrote: >> In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function >> sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it >> was never used. ...but a qui

Re: [RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used

2017-05-30 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote: > In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function > sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it > was never used. ...but a quick look at the code shows that we should > also be able to remove the s

[RFC PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: Delete sst_shim_regs64; saved regs are never used

2017-05-30 Thread Douglas Anderson
In commit 9a075265c6dc ("ASoC: Intel: sst: Remove unused function sst_restore_shim64()"), we deleted the sst_restore_shim64() since it was never used. ...but a quick look at the code shows that we should also be able to remove the sst_save_shim64() function and the structure members we were storin