On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 19:36:50 +0200
Gerald Schaefer wrote:
[..]
>
> It seems now that the generalization is very well accepted so far,
> apart from some apparent issues on arm. Also, merging 2 + 3 and
> putting them first seems to be acceptable, so we could do that for
> v3, if there are no
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:22:39 +0200
Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 07/09/2020 à 22:12, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> >> This is v2 of an RFC previously discussed here:
> >>
Le 07/09/2020 à 22:12, Mike Rapoport a écrit :
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
This is v2 of an RFC previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200828140314.8556-1-gerald.schae...@linux.ibm.com/
Patch 1 is a fix for a regression in gup_fast on
Le 07/09/2020 à 20:00, Gerald Schaefer a écrit :
This is v2 of an RFC previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200828140314.8556-1-gerald.schae...@linux.ibm.com/
Patch 1 is a fix for a regression in gup_fast on s390, after our conversion
to common gup_fast code. It will
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 08:00:55PM +0200, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> This is v2 of an RFC previously discussed here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200828140314.8556-1-gerald.schae...@linux.ibm.com/
>
> Patch 1 is a fix for a regression in gup_fast on s390, after our conversion
> to common
This is v2 of an RFC previously discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200828140314.8556-1-gerald.schae...@linux.ibm.com/
Patch 1 is a fix for a regression in gup_fast on s390, after our conversion
to common gup_fast code. It will introduce special helper functions
pXd_addr_end_folded(),
6 matches
Mail list logo
