Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/31] tracing: Add a comment about ftrace_regs definition

2023-11-10 Thread Google
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:11:31 + Mark Rutland wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:14:52AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 23:24:32 +0900 > > "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote: > > > > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > > > > > > To clarify what will be expected on ft

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/31] tracing: Add a comment about ftrace_regs definition

2023-11-10 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 08:14:52AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 23:24:32 +0900 > "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote: > > > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > > > > To clarify what will be expected on ftrace_regs, add a comment to the > > architecture independent definition

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 01/31] tracing: Add a comment about ftrace_regs definition

2023-11-08 Thread Google
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 23:24:32 +0900 "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote: > From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > > To clarify what will be expected on ftrace_regs, add a comment to the > architecture independent definition of the ftrace_regs. > > Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) > --- > Cha

[RFC PATCH v2 01/31] tracing: Add a comment about ftrace_regs definition

2023-11-08 Thread Masami Hiramatsu (Google)
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) To clarify what will be expected on ftrace_regs, add a comment to the architecture independent definition of the ftrace_regs. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) --- Changes in v2: - newly added. --- include/linux/ftrace.h | 25