On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 06:59:35AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 1:53 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:17:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 1:53 PM
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:17:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > > >
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 01:17:11PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at
Hi,
On 1/7/21 3:16 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 06:55:16AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
> > > >
> > > >
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:09 PM
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 02:04:29AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky
> > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > > I asked
> From: Leon Romanovsky
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 12:02 AM
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > > I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
> > > Will you
On 1/7/21 12:01 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
Will you remove QEMU from this list? If yes, how such
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 11:23:39AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> > I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
> > Will you remove QEMU from this list? If yes, how such "new" kernel will
> > work on old
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:40:17PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> I asked what will you do when QEMU will gain needed functionality?
> Will you remove QEMU from this list? If yes, how such "new" kernel will
> work on old QEMU versions?
The needed functionality is some VMM hypercall, so
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 06:10:09PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> On 2021/1/6 14:06, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:27:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > > The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
> > > platform is not able to support IMS
Hi Leon,
On 2021/1/6 14:06, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:27:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise,
the isolation of interrupt is not
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:27:49AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
> platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise,
> the isolation of interrupt is not guaranteed.
>
> For x86, IMS is only supported on
The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying
platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise,
the isolation of interrupt is not guaranteed.
For x86, IMS is only supported on bare metal for now. We could enable it
in the virtualization
15 matches
Mail list logo