Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] iommu: Evolve to support more scenarios of using IOPF

Hi Baolu, On 2021/3/10 10:09, Lu Baolu wrote: > Hi Shenming, > > On 3/9/21 2:22 PM, Shenming Lu wrote: >> This patch follows the discussion here: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/YAaxjmJW+ZMvrhac@myrica/ >> >> In order to support more scenarios of using IOPF (mainly consider >> the nested

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] iommu: Evolve to support more scenarios of using IOPF

Hi Shenming, On 3/9/21 2:22 PM, Shenming Lu wrote: This patch follows the discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/YAaxjmJW+ZMvrhac@myrica/ In order to support more scenarios of using IOPF (mainly consider the nested extension), besides keeping IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF as a general capab

[RFC PATCH v2 1/6] iommu: Evolve to support more scenarios of using IOPF

This patch follows the discussion here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/YAaxjmJW+ZMvrhac@myrica/ In order to support more scenarios of using IOPF (mainly consider the nested extension), besides keeping IOMMU_DEV_FEAT_IOPF as a general capability for whether delivering faults through the IOMMU,