Hi Kalle/Brian,
>> RFC: I'd appreciate it if someone from Marvell could double check my work
>> here.
>BTW, if we don't hear anything from Marvell I'm going to apply these
>anyway.
This patch series looks good to us.
Thanks,
Ganapathi
Brian Norris writes:
> Comparing the existing TX_BITRATE parsing code (in
> mwifiex_parse_htinfo()) with the RX bitrate histograms in debugfs.c, it
> appears that the rxpd_rate and rxpd_htinfo fields have the same format.
> At least, they give reasonable results when I parse them this way.
>
>
Comparing the existing TX_BITRATE parsing code (in
mwifiex_parse_htinfo()) with the RX bitrate histograms in debugfs.c, it
appears that the rxpd_rate and rxpd_htinfo fields have the same format.
At least, they give reasonable results when I parse them this way.
So this patch adds support for
3 matches
Mail list logo
