On 20/04/18 09:31, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Friday 20 Apr 2018 at 01:14:35 (-0700), Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Quentin Perret
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 16:56:39 (-0700), Joel Fernand
On Friday 20 Apr 2018 at 01:14:35 (-0700), Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Quentin Perret
> > wrote:
> >> On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 16:56:39 (-0700), Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 1:13 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Quentin Perret
> wrote:
>> On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 16:56:39 (-0700), Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
>>> wrote:
>>> > From: Thara Gopinath
>>> >
>>>
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 4:17 AM, Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 16:56:39 (-0700), Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
>> wrote:
>> > From: Thara Gopinath
>> >
>> > Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
On Friday 13 Apr 2018 at 16:56:39 (-0700), Joel Fernandes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
> wrote:
> > From: Thara Gopinath
> >
> > Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
> > overutilized. There must be cpu time available to place tas
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:39:21PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 04/17/2018 04:25 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
>
> >>@@ -5394,8 +5416,10 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct
> >>*p, int flags)
> >>update_cfs_group(se);
> >>}
> >>- if (!se)
> >>+ if (!se) {
> >>
On 04/17/2018 04:25 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
@@ -5394,8 +5416,10 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int flags)
update_cfs_group(se);
}
- if (!se)
+ if (!se) {
add_nr_running(rq, 1);
+ update_overutilized_status(rq
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:36:04PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> From: Thara Gopinath
>
> Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
> overutilized. There must be cpu time available to place tasks based on
> utilization in an energy-aware fashion, i.e. to pack tasks on
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Dietmar Eggemann
wrote:
> From: Thara Gopinath
>
> Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
> overutilized. There must be cpu time available to place tasks based on
> utilization in an energy-aware fashion, i.e. to pack tasks on
> ene
From: Thara Gopinath
Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
overutilized. There must be cpu time available to place tasks based on
utilization in an energy-aware fashion, i.e. to pack tasks on
energy-efficient cpus without harming the overall throughput.
In case the s
10 matches
Mail list logo