- On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>>
>> > arm64 sys_membarrier number is
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 05:38:04PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
>
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> - On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
> > arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through
> > asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated
- On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through
> asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated separately for
> the 32-bit compability layer of arm64.
>
> [ Untested on this
- On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through
> asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated separately for
> the 32-bit compability layer of arm64.
>
> [ Untested on this
- On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>>
>> > arm64 sys_membarrier number is
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 05:38:04PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Sep 16, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
>
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> >> - On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Sep 7, 2015, at 12:15 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
> > arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through
> > asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated
arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through
asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated separately for
the 32-bit compability layer of arm64.
[ Untested on this architecture. To try it out: fetch linux-next/akpm,
apply this patch, build/run a membarrier-enabled kernel,
arm64 sys_membarrier number is already wired for arm64 through
asm-generic/unistd.h, but needs to be allocated separately for
the 32-bit compability layer of arm64.
[ Untested on this architecture. To try it out: fetch linux-next/akpm,
apply this patch, build/run a membarrier-enabled kernel,
10 matches
Mail list logo