On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 02:42:47PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 06:18 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the third version of my proposal for more complete alternate
> > mode support. In this version I'm including a proposal for the mux
> > handling. Basically, I'm
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 02:42:47PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 06:18 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the third version of my proposal for more complete alternate
> > mode support. In this version I'm including a proposal for the mux
> > handling. Basically, I'm
On 05/11/2018 06:18 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Hi,
This is the third version of my proposal for more complete alternate
mode support. In this version I'm including a proposal for the mux
handling. Basically, I'm proposing that every supported alternate will
have its own mux handle. That should
On 05/11/2018 06:18 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Hi,
This is the third version of my proposal for more complete alternate
mode support. In this version I'm including a proposal for the mux
handling. Basically, I'm proposing that every supported alternate will
have its own mux handle. That should
Hi,
This is the third version of my proposal for more complete alternate
mode support. In this version I'm including a proposal for the mux
handling. Basically, I'm proposing that every supported alternate will
have its own mux handle. That should allow us to support multiple
alternate modes at
Hi,
This is the third version of my proposal for more complete alternate
mode support. In this version I'm including a proposal for the mux
handling. Basically, I'm proposing that every supported alternate will
have its own mux handle. That should allow us to support multiple
alternate modes at
6 matches
Mail list logo