On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 11:17 -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:50:44PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > This patch tries to solve the device hot remove locking issues in a
> > different way from commit 5e33bc41, as kernfs already has a mechanism
> > to break active protecti
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:50:44PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> This patch tries to solve the device hot remove locking issues in a
> different way from commit 5e33bc41, as kernfs already has a mechanism
> to break active protection.
>
> The problem here is the order of s_active, and series
This patch tries to solve the device hot remove locking issues in a
different way from commit 5e33bc41, as kernfs already has a mechanism
to break active protection.
The problem here is the order of s_active, and series of hotplug related
lock.
This patch takes s_active out of the lock depende
3 matches
Mail list logo
