Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:38 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Ian Kent writes: > > > Here is another update to the attempt at contained helper execution. > > > > The main change is I've tried to incorporate Oleg's suggestions > > of directly constructing the namespaces rather than using the > > o

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-19 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Ian Kent writes: > Here is another update to the attempt at contained helper execution. > > The main change is I've tried to incorporate Oleg's suggestions > of directly constructing the namespaces rather than using the > open/setns approach and the addition of a namespace hash store. > > I'm not

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-18 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:44:49AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > The other change has been to the nfs and KEYS patches. > I've introduced the ability to get a token that can be used to > save namespace information for later execution and I've attempted > to use that for persistent namespace execution, a

[RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-16 Thread Ian Kent
Here is another update to the attempt at contained helper execution. The main change is I've tried to incorporate Oleg's suggestions of directly constructing the namespaces rather than using the open/setns approach and the addition of a namespace hash store. I'm not particularly happy with this s