inux...@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level for x86
>
>
>
> On 3/23/21 4:21 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>
> >>
> >> On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> >>> From: Tim
On 3/23/21 4:21 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>> From: Tim Chen
>>>
>>> There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
>>> is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
>>> to one single core.
>>>
>>> To
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org;
> > xuwei (O) ; Zengtao (B) ;
> > guodong...@linaro.org; yangyicong ; Liguozhu
> (Kenneth)
> > ; linux...@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster sched
inux...@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level for x86
>
>
>
> On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Tim Chen
> >
> > There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
>
On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Tim Chen
>
> There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
> is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
> to one single core.
>
> To prevent oversubscription of L2 cache, load should be
> balanced between
From: Tim Chen
There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
to one single core.
To prevent oversubscription of L2 cache, load should be
balanced between such L2 clusters, especially for tasks with
no shared data.
6 matches
Mail list logo
