On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:58:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > These were here mostly to help as wrappers for PCI_MSI
> > under certain UP 32-bit build scenarios, now that PCI_MSI
> > properly selects what
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 05:58:27PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
These were here mostly to help as wrappers for PCI_MSI
under certain UP 32-bit build scenarios, now that PCI_MSI
properly selects what
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> These were here mostly to help as wrappers for PCI_MSI
> under certain UP 32-bit build scenarios, now that PCI_MSI
> properly selects what it needs and when it needs it these
> Kconfig options are now only enabling
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
These were here mostly to help as wrappers for PCI_MSI
under certain UP 32-bit build scenarios, now that PCI_MSI
properly selects what it needs and when it needs it these
Kconfig options are now only enabling users reduce the size
of 32-bit kernels optionally. Since
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
These were here mostly to help as wrappers for PCI_MSI
under certain UP 32-bit build scenarios, now that PCI_MSI
properly selects what it needs and when it needs it these
Kconfig options are now only
From: Luis R. Rodriguez mcg...@suse.com
These were here mostly to help as wrappers for PCI_MSI
under certain UP 32-bit build scenarios, now that PCI_MSI
properly selects what it needs and when it needs it these
Kconfig options are now only enabling users reduce the size
of 32-bit kernels
6 matches
Mail list logo
