On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 8:09 AM, sathya wrote:
> On 08/18/2017 05:38 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM,
>> wrote:
>>> +struct intel_ipc_dev_cfg {
>>> + void __iomem *base;
>>> + void __iomem *wrbuf_reg;
>>> + void __iomem *rbuf_reg;
>>> + void _
Hi Andy,
On 08/18/2017 05:38 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM,
wrote:
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Currently intel_scu_ipc.c, intel_pmc_ipc.c and intel_punit_ipc.c
redundantly implements the same IPC features and has lot of code
duplication between them. This dr
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM,
wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> Currently intel_scu_ipc.c, intel_pmc_ipc.c and intel_punit_ipc.c
> redundantly implements the same IPC features and has lot of code
> duplication between them. This driver addresses this issue by grouping
> the common I
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Currently intel_scu_ipc.c, intel_pmc_ipc.c and intel_punit_ipc.c
redundantly implements the same IPC features and has lot of code
duplication between them. This driver addresses this issue by grouping
the common IPC functionalities under the same driver.
Signed-o
4 matches
Mail list logo