On 2021/3/24 9:49, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 5:55 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/3/20 2:15, Cong Wang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:33 AM Yunsheng Lin
>>> wrote:
On 2021/3/17 21:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On 3/17/21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 5:55 PM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/20 2:15, Cong Wang wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:33 AM Yunsheng Lin
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2021/3/17 21:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >>> On 3/17/21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Cong Wang writes:
>
>
On 2021/3/20 3:03, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:33 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>> That offer definitely still stands. Generalization sounds like a lot of fun.
>>>
>>> Keep in mind though that it's an eventually consistent queue, not an
>>> immediately consistent one, so that
On 2021/3/20 2:15, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:33 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/3/17 21:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> On 3/17/21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Cong Wang writes:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>
>> I
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:33 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> > That offer definitely still stands. Generalization sounds like a lot of fun.
> >
> > Keep in mind though that it's an eventually consistent queue, not an
> > immediately consistent one, so that might not match all use cases. It
> > works
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 12:33 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/17 21:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On 3/17/21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> Cong Wang writes:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> I thought pfifo was supposed to be
On 18.03.21 08:46, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2021/3/18 15:10, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 15.03.21 04:10, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>> Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
>>> flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
>>> qdisc because skb is always
On 2021/3/18 15:10, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 15.03.21 04:10, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
>> flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
>> qdisc because skb is always enqueued to qdisc even when the qdisc
>> is empty,
On 2021/3/17 21:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On 3/17/21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Cong Wang writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
I thought pfifo was supposed to be "lockless" and this change
re-introduces a lock between producer and
On 15.03.21 04:10, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
> flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
> qdisc because skb is always enqueued to qdisc even when the qdisc
> is empty, see __dev_xmit_skb().
>
> This patch calls
On 3/17/21, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Cong Wang writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought pfifo was supposed to be "lockless" and this change
>>> re-introduces a lock between producer and consumer, no?
>>
>> It has never been truly lockless, it
Cong Wang writes:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>
>> I thought pfifo was supposed to be "lockless" and this change
>> re-introduces a lock between producer and consumer, no?
>
> It has never been truly lockless, it uses two spinlocks in the ring buffer
>
On 2021/3/17 6:48, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>
>> I thought pfifo was supposed to be "lockless" and this change
>> re-introduces a lock between producer and consumer, no?
>
> It has never been truly lockless, it uses two spinlocks in the ring
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 2:07 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> I thought pfifo was supposed to be "lockless" and this change
> re-introduces a lock between producer and consumer, no?
It has never been truly lockless, it uses two spinlocks in the ring buffer
implementation, and it introduced a
On 2021/3/16 16:15, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:35 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/3/16 2:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:10:18 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
@@ -606,6 +623,11 @@ static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
*/
struct
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:35 AM Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/16 2:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:10:18 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> >> @@ -606,6 +623,11 @@ static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
> >> */
> >> struct pfifo_fast_priv {
> >> struct skb_array
On 2021/3/16 8:35, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2021/3/16 2:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:10:18 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>>> @@ -606,6 +623,11 @@ static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
>>> */
>>> struct pfifo_fast_priv {
>>> struct skb_array q[PFIFO_FAST_BANDS];
On 2021/3/16 2:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:10:18 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> @@ -606,6 +623,11 @@ static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
>> */
>> struct pfifo_fast_priv {
>> struct skb_array q[PFIFO_FAST_BANDS];
>> +
>> +/* protect against data race
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 11:10:18 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> @@ -606,6 +623,11 @@ static const u8 prio2band[TC_PRIO_MAX + 1] = {
> */
> struct pfifo_fast_priv {
> struct skb_array q[PFIFO_FAST_BANDS];
> +
> + /* protect against data race between enqueue/dequeue and
> + * qdisc->empty
On 3/15/21 4:10 AM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
> flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
> qdisc because skb is always enqueued to qdisc even when the qdisc
> is empty, see __dev_xmit_skb().
>
> This patch calls
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:10:18AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
> flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
> qdisc because skb is always enqueued to qdisc even when the qdisc
> is empty, see __dev_xmit_skb().
Currently pfifo_fast has both TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS and TCQ_F_NOLOCK
flag set, but queue discipline by-pass does not work for lockless
qdisc because skb is always enqueued to qdisc even when the qdisc
is empty, see __dev_xmit_skb().
This patch calls sch_direct_xmit() to transmit the skb directly
to
22 matches
Mail list logo
