Sergei Shtylyov writes:
> Hello.
>
> On 3/16/2016 12:04 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>
>> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
>> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>>
>> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
>> negotiated
Hello.
On 3/16/2016 12:04 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:04:13PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
>> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>>
>> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:04:13PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>
> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
> negotiated MTU. A future commit will
This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a
warning is emitted if the guest c
5 matches
Mail list logo