On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 11:56:04AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 06/17/2017 09:22 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> > Added test support for PowerPC implementation off protection keys.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ram Pai
>
> First of all, there are a lot of instances where we use *pkru*
> named functions o
On 06/17/2017 09:22 AM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Added test support for PowerPC implementation off protection keys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai
First of all, there are a lot of instances where we use *pkru*
named functions on power even the real implementations have
taken care of doing appropriate things
Ram Pai writes:
> Added test support for PowerPC implementation off protection keys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile |1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h | 365 +++
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 1451
Added test support for PowerPC implementation off protection keys.
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile |1 +
tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h | 365 +++
tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 1451 +
tool
4 matches
Mail list logo