On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 12:32:35PM -0500, Rhyland Klein wrote:
[...]
> >>Anton, David, would you be adverse to the changing of supplied_to
> >>from being a
> >>list of batteries stored in a charger to being a list of chargers
> >>stored in batteries?
> >>
> >I wonder if we can support both ways?..
On 3/2/2013 5:48 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Rhyland Klein wrote:
[...]
Anton, David, would you be adverse to the changing of supplied_to
from being a
list of batteries stored in a charger to being a list of chargers
stored in batteries?
I wonder if we c
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:48:03PM -0500, Rhyland Klein wrote:
[...]
> Anton, David, would you be adverse to the changing of supplied_to
> from being a
> list of batteries stored in a charger to being a list of chargers
> stored in batteries?
I wonder if we can support both ways?..
Thanks,
Anton
On 2/22/2013 6:01 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/22/2013 02:55 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
On 2/22/2013 2:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
dt features to make the general code cleaner. T
On 2/22/2013 4:58 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
On 2/22/2013 3:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
attempt to commonize how charge
On 02/22/2013 02:55 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> On 2/22/2013 2:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
>>> With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
>>> dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
>>> attempt to commo
On 2/22/2013 3:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
attempt to commonize how chargers and their supplies are linked.
Following
On 2/22/2013 2:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
attempt to commonize how chargers and their supplies are linked.
Following
On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
> dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
> attempt to commonize how chargers and their supplies are linked.
>
> Following common dt convention, the "supplied-
On 02/21/2013 04:11 PM, Rhyland Klein wrote:
> With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
> dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
> attempt to commonize how chargers and their supplies are linked.
>
> Following common dt convention, the "supplied-
With the growing support for dt, it make sense to try to make use of
dt features to make the general code cleaner. This patch is an
attempt to commonize how chargers and their supplies are linked.
Following common dt convention, the "supplied-to" char** list is
replaced with phandle lists defined
11 matches
Mail list logo
