On 11/03/2021 10:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:08 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>> On 10/03/2021 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>>> wrote:
On 10/03/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> This edac Altera driv
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:08 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On 10/03/2021 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > wrote:
> >> On 10/03/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> This edac Altera driver is very weird... it uses the same compatible
On 10/03/2021 17:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>> On 10/03/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> This edac Altera driver is very weird... it uses the same compatible
>>> differently depending whether this is 32-bit or 64-bit (e.g. Stra
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:54 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On 10/03/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > This edac Altera driver is very weird... it uses the same compatible
> > differently depending whether this is 32-bit or 64-bit (e.g. Stratix
> > 10)! On ARMv7 the compatible means for
On 10/03/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/03/2021 16:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
>> wrote:
>>> On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote:
On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix
On 10/03/2021 16:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> wrote:
>> On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote:
>>> On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS,
>> ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 4:06 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote:
> On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote:
> > On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> Many other architectures do not have vendor prefix (TEGRA, EXYNOS,
> ZYNQMP etc). I would call it the same as in ARMv7 - ARCH_SOCFPGA - but
> the Altera EDA
On 10/03/2021 15:45, Tom Rix wrote:
>
> On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Prepare for merging Stratix 10, Agilex and N5X into one arm64
>>> architecture by first renaming the ARCH_STRATIX10 into ARCH_SOCFPGA64.
>>>
>>> The existing ARCH_
On 3/10/21 1:45 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> Prepare for merging Stratix 10, Agilex and N5X into one arm64
>> architecture by first renaming the ARCH_STRATIX10 into ARCH_SOCFPGA64.
>>
>> The existing ARCH_SOCFPGA (in ARMv7) Kconfig symbol cannot be u
On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Prepare for merging Stratix 10, Agilex and N5X into one arm64
> architecture by first renaming the ARCH_STRATIX10 into ARCH_SOCFPGA64.
>
> The existing ARCH_SOCFPGA (in ARMv7) Kconfig symbol cannot be used
> because altera_edac driver builds diffe
Prepare for merging Stratix 10, Agilex and N5X into one arm64
architecture by first renaming the ARCH_STRATIX10 into ARCH_SOCFPGA64.
The existing ARCH_SOCFPGA (in ARMv7) Kconfig symbol cannot be used
because altera_edac driver builds differently between them (with
ifdefs).
Signed-off-by: Krzyszto
11 matches
Mail list logo
