Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-17 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 17-07-17, 12:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 12-07-17, 16:28, Rob Herring wrote: > > > Display is a pretty well known use case here. Do you have other > > > examples in mind? > > > > No, I don't. > > > > @Stephen: Do you have more c

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-17 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 03:06:08PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-07-17, 16:28, Rob Herring wrote: > > Display is a pretty well known use case here. Do you have other > > examples in mind? > > No, I don't. > > @Stephen: Do you have more cases like this for your Qcom products ? > > > Other ca

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-13 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 13-07-17, 17:46, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > This makes more sense. The LCD being able to do DVFS was missing from the last > discussion. I assume this is for power saving purposes? Yeah. > Otherwise one could just > say you should not use the lower part of the voltage range. And DVFS is for > the

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-13 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 13-07-17, 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> I'm afraid the regulator case still doesn't make sense. The voltage >> constraints should be set within each supplies device node. This was >> explained in the discussion in v1 [1]. > > I thought we w

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-13 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 12-07-17, 16:28, Rob Herring wrote: > Display is a pretty well known use case here. Do you have other > examples in mind? No, I don't. @Stephen: Do you have more cases like this for your Qcom products ? > Other cases I've seen are automotive with keeping > the backup camera going and CAN bus

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-12 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 13-07-17, 10:52, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > I'm afraid the regulator case still doesn't make sense. The voltage > constraints should be set within each supplies device node. This was > explained in the discussion in v1 [1]. I thought we were discussing about something I mentioned in one of my exampl

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-12 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> This adds device tree bindings for boot constraints. Only power supply >> constraint types are supported currently. >> >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/b

Re: [RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-12 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:34 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > This adds device tree bindings for boot constraints. Only power supply > constraint types are supported currently. > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/boot-constraints.txt | 68 > ++ > 1

[RFC v2 5/6] drivers: boot_constraint: Add initial DT bindings

2017-07-11 Thread Viresh Kumar
This adds device tree bindings for boot constraints. Only power supply constraint types are supported currently. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- .../devicetree/bindings/boot-constraints.txt | 68 ++ 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devi