Re: [RFC v2 6/7] mm/powerpc: Use generic VDSO remap and unmap functions

2016-11-07 Thread Michael Ellerman
Laurent Dufour writes: > On 04/11/2016 05:59, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Christopher Covington writes: >> >>> The PowerPC VDSO remap and unmap code was copied to a generic location, >>> only modifying the variable name expected in mm->context (vdso instead of >>> vdso_base) to match most other

Re: [RFC v2 6/7] mm/powerpc: Use generic VDSO remap and unmap functions

2016-11-07 Thread Laurent Dufour
On 04/11/2016 05:59, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Christopher Covington writes: > >> The PowerPC VDSO remap and unmap code was copied to a generic location, >> only modifying the variable name expected in mm->context (vdso instead of >> vdso_base) to match most other architectures. Having adopted th

Re: [RFC v2 6/7] mm/powerpc: Use generic VDSO remap and unmap functions

2016-11-03 Thread Michael Ellerman
Christopher Covington writes: > The PowerPC VDSO remap and unmap code was copied to a generic location, > only modifying the variable name expected in mm->context (vdso instead of > vdso_base) to match most other architectures. Having adopted this generic > naming, drop the code in arch/powerpc a

[RFC v2 6/7] mm/powerpc: Use generic VDSO remap and unmap functions

2016-11-01 Thread Christopher Covington
The PowerPC VDSO remap and unmap code was copied to a generic location, only modifying the variable name expected in mm->context (vdso instead of vdso_base) to match most other architectures. Having adopted this generic naming, drop the code in arch/powerpc and use the generic version. Signed-off-