Hi Vincent,
Thank you for your review.
On 11/15/2012 11:43 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Preeti,
>
> On 15 November 2012 17:54, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> Currently the load balancer weighs a task based upon its priority,and this
>> weight consequently gets added up to the weight of the run
Hi Vincent,
Thank you for your review.
On 11/15/2012 11:43 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
Hi Preeti,
On 15 November 2012 17:54, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Currently the load balancer weighs a task based upon its priority,and this
weight consequently gets added up to the
Hi Preeti,
On 15 November 2012 17:54, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Currently the load balancer weighs a task based upon its priority,and this
> weight consequently gets added up to the weight of the run queue that it is
> on.It is this weight of the runqueue that sums up to a sched group's load
>
Currently the load balancer weighs a task based upon its priority,and this
weight consequently gets added up to the weight of the run queue that it is
on.It is this weight of the runqueue that sums up to a sched group's load
which is used to decide the busiest or the idlest group and the runqueue
Currently the load balancer weighs a task based upon its priority,and this
weight consequently gets added up to the weight of the run queue that it is
on.It is this weight of the runqueue that sums up to a sched group's load
which is used to decide the busiest or the idlest group and the runqueue
Hi Preeti,
On 15 November 2012 17:54, Preeti U Murthy pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Currently the load balancer weighs a task based upon its priority,and this
weight consequently gets added up to the weight of the run queue that it is
on.It is this weight of the runqueue that sums up to a
6 matches
Mail list logo