Hello,
On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 09:19:08AM -0800, Sanjay Ghemawat wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > This is still RFC because we need more input from user-space
> > people, more stress test, design discussion about interface/reclaim
>
> Speaking as one of the authors
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:27 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This is still RFC because we need more input from user-space
> people, more stress test, design discussion about interface/reclaim
Speaking as one of the authors of tcmalloc, I don't see any particular
need for this new system call for tcmalloc
This is still RFC because we need more input from user-space
people, more stress test, design discussion about interface/reclaim
policy of volatile pages and I want to expand this concept to tmpfs
volatile range if it is possbile without big performance drop of
anonymous volatile range.
(Let's defi
3 matches
Mail list logo
