>> Then, you introduced bisect breakage. It is definitely unacceptable.
>
> What is "bisect breakage" meaning?
Think what's happen when only applying path [1/21].
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More m
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/09/29 7:15, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
wrote:
Hi Chen,
2012/09/28 11:22, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:50 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
>
> 2012/09/28 11:22, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
>>
>> On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>>>
>>> remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is called in two cases:
>>> 1. hot remo
Hi Chen,
2012/09/28 11:22, Ni zhan Chen wrote:
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is called in two cases:
1. hot remove a memory device
2. echo offline >/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXX/state
In the 1st
On 09/05/2012 05:25 PM, we...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is called in two cases:
1. hot remove a memory device
2. echo offline >/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXX/state
In the 1st case, we should also change memory block's state
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu
remove_memory() only try to offline pages. It is called in two cases:
1. hot remove a memory device
2. echo offline >/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXX/state
In the 1st case, we should also change memory block's state, and notify
the userspace that the memory block's sta
6 matches
Mail list logo
