On 29/06/15 10:06, pang.xun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> Hi Abel,
>
> Abel Vesa wrote 2015-06-29 AM 04:26:31:
>>
>> Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/34] sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware
> scheduling
[...]
>> I wasn't able to determine the cause from the line:
>
Hi Abel,
Abel Vesa wrote 2015-06-29 AM 04:26:31:
>
> Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 00/34] sched: Energy cost model for energy-aware
scheduling
>
> Hi,
>
> So I tried to play around a little bit with this patchset. I did a
> checkout from:
>
> git://linux-arm.org/linux-po
Hi,
So I tried to play around a little bit with this patchset. I did a
checkout from:
git://linux-arm.org/linux-power.git energy_model_rfc_v4
and then, when I tried to enable the ENERGY_AWARE from sysfs inside
qemu (x86_64) and I got this:
[69452.750245] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging requ
Hi Sai,
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:07:26PM +0100, Sai Gurrappadi wrote:
>
> On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > Test results for ARM TC2 (2xA15+3xA7) with cpufreq enabled:
> >
> > sysbench: Single task running for 3 seconds.
> > rt-app [4]: mp3 playback use-case model
> > rt-app
On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> Test results for ARM TC2 (2xA15+3xA7) with cpufreq enabled:
>
> sysbench: Single task running for 3 seconds.
> rt-app [4]: mp3 playback use-case model
> rt-app [4]: 5 ~[6,13,19,25,31,38,44,50]% periodic (2ms) tasks
>
> Note: % is relative to the
Several techniques for saving energy through various scheduler
modifications have been proposed in the past, however most of the
techniques have not been universally beneficial for all use-cases and
platforms. For example, consolidating tasks on fewer cpus is an
effective way to save energy on some
6 matches
Mail list logo
