Re: [RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS

2019-10-17 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 17-10-19, 16:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > [Also note that the current code in device PM QoS uses MIN and MAX > here in the same way. :-)] Stupid me, enough embarrassment for the day :( -- viresh

Re: [RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS

2019-10-17 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 11:41 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 16-10-19, 12:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Introduce frequency QoS, based on the "raw" low-level PM QoS, to > > represent min and max frequency requests and aggregate constraints. > > > > The min and ma

Re: [RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS

2019-10-17 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 16-10-19, 12:41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Introduce frequency QoS, based on the "raw" low-level PM QoS, to > represent min and max frequency requests and aggregate constraints. > > The min and max frequency requests are to be represented by > struct freq_qos_requ

[RFT][PATCH 1/3] PM: QoS: Introduce frequency QoS

2019-10-16 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Introduce frequency QoS, based on the "raw" low-level PM QoS, to represent min and max frequency requests and aggregate constraints. The min and max frequency requests are to be represented by struct freq_qos_request objects and the aggregate constraints are to be represe