On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:40:33AM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> > What brand/model your sata_mv controller is? Would be nice to know to be
> > able to get a "known-to-work" one..
>
> http://supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> What brand/model your sata_mv controller is? Would be nice to know to be
> able to get a "known-to-work" one..
http://supermicro.com/products/accessories/addon/AoC-SAT2-MV8.cfm
-dean
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 07:15:26PM -0700, dean gaudet wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > dean gaudet wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > >
> > > > dean gaudet wrote:
> > > > > oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd
> > > > > if=/d
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> > > dean gaudet wrote:
> > > > oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd
> > > > if=/dev/sdX
> > > > of=/dev/null" and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this si
dean gaudet wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
dean gaudet wrote:
oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd if=/dev/sdX
of=/dev/null" and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
test.
for lack of a better test i started an untar/diff stress tes
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> dean gaudet wrote:
> > oh very nice... no warnings on boot, and no warnings while i "dd if=/dev/sdX
> > of=/dev/null" and i'm seeing 74MB/s+ from each disk on this simple read
> > test.
> >
> > for lack of a better test i started an untar/diff stress test
dean gaudet wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that routin
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
> applied.
>
> In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
> particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
> because that routine went awa
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that routine went away. Its EDMA handling was potentially racy
as well.
9 matches
Mail list logo