On 25/03/2021 04.04, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:59:21PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
So far we've kept arch/arm64/ largely devoid of IMP-DEF bits, and it
seems a shame to add something with the sole purpose of collating that,
especially given arch code shouldn't need to touch th
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:59:21PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:38:18PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:38:48AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> > > Apple ARM64 SoCs have a ton of vendor-specific registers we're going to
> > > have to deal with, and
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 06:38:18PM +, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:38:48AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> > Apple ARM64 SoCs have a ton of vendor-specific registers we're going to
> > have to deal with, and those don't really belong in sysreg.h with all
> > the architectural r
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 06:38:48AM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> Apple ARM64 SoCs have a ton of vendor-specific registers we're going to
> have to deal with, and those don't really belong in sysreg.h with all
> the architectural registers. Make a new home for them, and add some
> registers which ar
Apple ARM64 SoCs have a ton of vendor-specific registers we're going to
have to deal with, and those don't really belong in sysreg.h with all
the architectural registers. Make a new home for them, and add some
registers which are useful for early bring-up.
Signed-off-by: Hector Martin
---
MAINTA
5 matches
Mail list logo
