2017-04-03 09:59 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
Hi,
2017-04-03 08:34 keltezéssel, Paul Menzel írta:
Dear Zoltán,
Am Samstag, den 01.04.2017, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Boszormenyi Zoltan:
[…]
and have split the patch into three pieces now (USB quirks, i2c-piix4
and sp5100_tco) and they
2017-04-03 09:59 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
Hi,
2017-04-03 08:34 keltezéssel, Paul Menzel írta:
Dear Zoltán,
Am Samstag, den 01.04.2017, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Boszormenyi Zoltan:
[…]
and have split the patch into three pieces now (USB quirks, i2c-piix4
and sp5100_tco) and they
Hi,
2017-04-03 08:34 keltezéssel, Paul Menzel írta:
Dear Zoltán,
Am Samstag, den 01.04.2017, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Boszormenyi Zoltan:
[…]
and have split the patch into three pieces now (USB quirks, i2c-piix4
and sp5100_tco) and they were sent to the relevant mailing lists.
Could you
Hi,
2017-04-03 08:34 keltezéssel, Paul Menzel írta:
Dear Zoltán,
Am Samstag, den 01.04.2017, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Boszormenyi Zoltan:
[…]
and have split the patch into three pieces now (USB quirks, i2c-piix4
and sp5100_tco) and they were sent to the relevant mailing lists.
Could you
Dear Zoltán,
Am Samstag, den 01.04.2017, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Boszormenyi Zoltan:
[…]
> and have split the patch into three pieces now (USB quirks, i2c-piix4
> and sp5100_tco) and they were sent to the relevant mailing lists.
Could you please add me to the receiver list of these patches, so
Dear Zoltán,
Am Samstag, den 01.04.2017, 12:13 +0200 schrieb Boszormenyi Zoltan:
[…]
> and have split the patch into three pieces now (USB quirks, i2c-piix4
> and sp5100_tco) and they were sent to the relevant mailing lists.
Could you please add me to the receiver list of these patches, so
2017-04-01 18:20 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
The best clean alternative would be add new resource handling infrastructure.
* Expose the currently static alloc_resource() in kernel/resource.c
With this, driver initialization can allocate the resource once
for the lifetime of the
2017-04-01 18:20 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
The best clean alternative would be add new resource handling infrastructure.
* Expose the currently static alloc_resource() in kernel/resource.c
With this, driver initialization can allocate the resource once
for the lifetime of the
On 04/01/2017 03:13 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2017-03-31 17:05 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2017-03-31 14:49 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
request_muxed_region() can fail, and literally every other driver
using it
On 04/01/2017 03:13 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2017-03-31 17:05 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2017-03-31 14:49 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
request_muxed_region() can fail, and literally every other driver
using it
2017-03-31 17:05 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2017-03-31 14:49 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
request_muxed_region() can fail, and literally every other driver
using it checks for that failure. Please do the same.
In
2017-03-31 17:05 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2017-03-31 14:49 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
request_muxed_region() can fail, and literally every other driver
using it checks for that failure. Please do the same.
In
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2017-03-31 14:49 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
> >Hi Paul,
> >
> >On 03/31/2017 12:17 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >>Dear Wolfram,
> >>
> >>
> >>Thank you for the reply, which we talked about briefly at the
> >>Chemnitzer
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 04:46:02PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2017-03-31 14:49 keltezéssel, Guenter Roeck írta:
> >Hi Paul,
> >
> >On 03/31/2017 12:17 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> >>Dear Wolfram,
> >>
> >>
> >>Thank you for the reply, which we talked about briefly at the
> >>Chemnitzer
Hi Paul,
On 03/31/2017 12:17 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Wolfram,
Thank you for the reply, which we talked about briefly at the
Chemnitzer LinuxTage.
Am Freitag, den 03.03.2017, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
multiplexed main
Hi Paul,
On 03/31/2017 12:17 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Wolfram,
Thank you for the reply, which we talked about briefly at the
Chemnitzer LinuxTage.
Am Freitag, den 03.03.2017, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
multiplexed main
Dear Wolfram,
Thank you for the reply, which we talked about briefly at the
Chemnitzer LinuxTage.
Am Freitag, den 03.03.2017, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> > Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
> > multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
Dear Wolfram,
Thank you for the reply, which we talked about briefly at the
Chemnitzer LinuxTage.
Am Freitag, den 03.03.2017, 11:17 +0100 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> > Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
> > multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
Dear Linux folks,
Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
reported that to the Linux Kernel Bugtracker as bug #170741 last
September [2], but it looks like the affected subsystems don’t use it.
So I just copy
Dear Linux folks,
Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
reported that to the Linux Kernel Bugtracker as bug #170741 last
September [2], but it looks like the affected subsystems don’t use it.
So I just copy
> Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
> multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
> reported that to the Linux Kernel Bugtracker as bug #170741 last
> September [2], but it looks like the affected subsystems don’t use it.
Jean Delvare pointed out
> Unfortunately, commit 2fee61d22e (i2c: piix4: Add support for
> multiplexed main adapter in SB800) [1] caused a regression. Tim
> reported that to the Linux Kernel Bugtracker as bug #170741 last
> September [2], but it looks like the affected subsystems don’t use it.
Jean Delvare pointed out
22 matches
Mail list logo
