Hi Suman,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> I have attached the patches but it is not accepted by Tejun yet, So I will
> post another version.
OK, thanks.
Since Tejun didn't think it is a workable approach, I am not going test
the attachment, but I will
Hi Suman,
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Suman Tripathi stripa...@apm.com wrote:
Hi Ming,
I have attached the patches but it is not accepted by Tejun yet, So I will
post another version.
OK, thanks.
Since Tejun didn't think it is a workable approach, I am not going test
the attachment,
Hi Suman,
Could you forward the patches to me so that I can give a test?
I don't subscribe to linux-ide list.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Suman Tripathi wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have just posted 3 patches "ata: Fix the dma state machine lockup for APM
> X-Gene SoC SATA
Hi Suman,
Could you forward the patches to me so that I can give a test?
I don't subscribe to linux-ide list.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Suman Tripathi stripa...@apm.com wrote:
Hi ,
I have just posted 3 patches ata: Fix the dma state machine lockup for APM
X-Gene
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:47 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi Tejun,
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > (cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> >>
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:47 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Tejun,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
(cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:47 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > (cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams
> >> wrote:
> >>
Hi Tejun,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
>
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> >> Hi Dan and
Hi Tejun,
>> >> Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
>> >> controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
>> >>
>> >> And the error does disappear after reverting the commit.
>> >
>> > Can you give some more details about the workload and the disk?
Hello,
(cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> Hi Dan and Tejun,
> >>
> >> Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi Dan and Tejun,
>>
>> Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
>> controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
>>
>> And the error does disappear
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Dan and Tejun,
>
> Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
> controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
>
> And the error does disappear after reverting the commit.
Can you give some more details
Hi Dan and Tejun,
Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
And the error does disappear after reverting the commit.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
[1], failure log
[ 72.001579] ata4.00: exception Emask 0x40 SAct
Hi Dan and Tejun,
Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
And the error does disappear after reverting the commit.
Thanks,
--
Ming Lei
[1], failure log
[ 72.001579] ata4.00: exception Emask 0x40 SAct
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Dan and Tejun,
Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
And the error does disappear after reverting the commit.
Can you give
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Dan and Tejun,
Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI
Hello,
(cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei ming@canonical.com wrote:
Hi Dan and Tejun,
Looks the commit
Hi Tejun,
Looks the commit 8a4aeec8d(libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered
controllers) causes below sata failure[1] on APM AHCI controller.
And the error does disappear after reverting the commit.
Can you give some more details about the workload and the disk? What
is the APM AHCI?
Hi Tejun,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
(cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams dan.j.willi...@intel.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Ming Lei
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:47 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Tejun,
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
(cc'ing ahci_xgene folks)
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 09:24:04PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan Williams
20 matches
Mail list logo
