Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-08-16 Thread Jiang Liu
On 08/16/2012 03:12 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: >> Commit 0d52f54e2ef64c189dedc332e680b2eb4a34590a (PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp >> ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug) added code that made the >> acpiphp driver completely ignore PCIe root

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-08-16 Thread Jiang Liu
On 08/16/2012 03:12 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Jiang Liu jiang@huawei.com wrote: Commit 0d52f54e2ef64c189dedc332e680b2eb4a34590a (PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug) added code that made the acpiphp driver completely ignore

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-08-15 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > Commit 0d52f54e2ef64c189dedc332e680b2eb4a34590a (PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp > ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug) added code that made the > acpiphp driver completely ignore PCIe root complexes for which the kernel > had been granted

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-08-15 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Jiang Liu jiang@huawei.com wrote: Commit 0d52f54e2ef64c189dedc332e680b2eb4a34590a (PCI / ACPI: Make acpiphp ignore root bridges using PCIe native hotplug) added code that made the acpiphp driver completely ignore PCIe root complexes for which the kernel had

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-07-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > Hi Bjorn and Yinghai, > What's the policy to export a symbol by EXPORT_SYMBOL() > or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? I know the legal difference, but don't > know when I should mark a symbol as GPL. >From Documentation/DocBook/kernel-hacking.tmpl,

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-07-09 Thread Jiang Liu
Hi Bjorn and Yinghai, What's the policy to export a symbol by EXPORT_SYMBOL() or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? I know the legal difference, but don't know when I should mark a symbol as GPL. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-07-09 Thread Jiang Liu
Hi Bjorn and Yinghai, What's the policy to export a symbol by EXPORT_SYMBOL() or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? I know the legal difference, but don't know when I should mark a symbol as GPL. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: [Resend with Ack][PATCH v1] PCI: allow acpiphp to handle PCIe ports without native PCIe hotplug capability

2012-07-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Jiang Liu jiang@huawei.com wrote: Hi Bjorn and Yinghai, What's the policy to export a symbol by EXPORT_SYMBOL() or EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()? I know the legal difference, but don't know when I should mark a symbol as GPL. From